Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aapkadomain.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (ESkog)^(Talk) 01:49, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Aapkadomain.com

Non-notable per WP:CORP and WP:WEB. Article is an advert. - Ganeshk (talk) 23:12, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

This article is not an advert .. it carries names and links of many competing websites namely: Network Solutions, Tucows, and GoDaddy - amit (talk)

For non-notable issue Kindly search popular misspell apkadomain along with aapkadomain on google . there is no dearth of articles - Regards amit (talk)

• Delete Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 00:37, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

• Kindly advise if i should make any changes to this article- Regards amit (talk)--Amit 01:22, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• And this company is one of the very few acredited .in registrar who's website is worth mention unless you are counting eNom OR rediff.com, and yes they already have got articles here..--amit (talk) 01:47, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as NN. --Satori Son 02:40, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

• Comment to article author and "keep" supporter amit: I assume you are Mr. Amit Yadav, President of the acquiring company. If so, or even if not, please don't take this deletion proposal personally. Wikipedia is not a comprehensive list that includes info on each and every significant business venture in the world. It is an encyclopedia of notable subjects. If you or anyone else can provide links to reliable and verifiable sources that show this article subject fulfills any of the criteria listed in Wikipedia:Notability (companies) or Wikipedia:Notability (websites), then please cite them here and in the article and it will not be deleted. Thank you for your time. --Satori Son 02:40, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as nn. Baseball,Baby! ^{balls•strikes} 07:12, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn, even Googling both only yields thirteen hits. --David Mestel^(Talk) 06:17, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep Granted, that this is not a major company. But the article is verified and the company has gained a niche market for itself.
• Delete per nom Davidpdx

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.