Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AaNet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:30, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AaNet

Article has no independent source and fails to source its statements. and per Jimbo no text is better than having unsourced Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 15:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

• Comment it seems a little WP:POINT to put an article up for deletion solely because it doesn't have any independent references, especially when the article contains no bold or controversial claims (even a little detective work will confirm that aaNet at least exists). FiggyBee 18:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Doesn't appear to meet WP:CORP. PCock 11:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per CSD:A7. "An internet provider in Queensland" is not an assertion of notability. Αργυριου (talk) 22:08, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.