Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A state of affairs

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 01:11, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] A state of affairs

Wikipedia still isn't a dictionary. Sonic Mew 15:39, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)

Support - Can't see how this can turn into anything else either. Secretlondon 15:43, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete - I've read it four times and I still don't understand the definition... need more coffee... -- Francs2000 | Talk [[]] 15:59, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. The text of this entry looks more like a definition for actus reus (which already has a better page on Wikipedia) than a definition or explanation of "a state of affairs". --Metropolitan90 17:00, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete The first bit is actus reus, the rest is who-knows-what. Xoloz 05:09, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete not encyclopedic - almost a speedy candidate with its lack of content. JamesBurns 05:59, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.