Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A place to bury strangers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] A place to bury strangers

A place to bury strangers (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non notable band, fails WP:MUSIC, multiple reposts so now to AFD for discussion. Sandahl 06:18, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep pretty wide media coverage, multiple sources, some of them reliable, found by searching for the bands name on google. Also, i like the name. :) ~ | twsx | talkcont | 08:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep but fix the capitalization. Torc2 21:10, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Actually, this same article was previously moved to A Place to Bury Strangers and deleted as an NN-band--Sandahl 21:45, 24 October 2007 (UTC).
Where are the previous AfDs then? The band might not have met WP:N before, but certainly does now. Torc2 21:49, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
The afd for A Place to Bury Strangers [1]. The deleted history of csds can't be seen by non admins. It's here for discussion as to whether it meets notabiliy or not.--Sandahl 22:47, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. While it may not have met the criteria previously, it seems to meet criterion #1, coverage. If it's claim of a national tour were sourced, it would also meet #4. (So far, I've sourced that this is regional, but not national. I'm still looking.) Regardless of #4, though, #1 is sufficient. Pitchfork seems pretty fond of the band. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:16, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Coverage from Pitchfork, Brainwashed, NY Times, Washington Post, a national tour with a more-than-established band? No-brainer keep. tomasz. 13:04, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.