Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Will of Fire

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Regretfully since I have great affection for hardcore and Scottish bands. Without WP:V/WP:RS to validate claims (and some here seem to have looked for sources), there is little to recommend keeping the article. Pigman☿ 05:26, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] A Will of Fire

A Will of Fire (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

I've forgot to nominate that one, but the album is from a band whom their article has been deleted per AFD discussion. So, obviously with the band not notable, the album is even less. JForget 17:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep: ok well, this article is useless, but the original Afd decision was based on the previous azriel article, which was updated by myself and now deleted. The fact that just because YOU haven't heard of them doesn't mean they don't exist. I believe this to be a censorship of something you know nothing about. your only scared of what you don't understand. And you are silencing my freedom of speech and information. You Are ruining wikipedia by not allowing independent articles be shown. I REALLY don't see what the problem is.Holdmyfinger (talk) 22:19, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Non-notable album by a clearly non-notable artist. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 18:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 (T / C) 19:06, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - Well, the band is surely non-notable. I trust the judgment that was made. It was likely that I wouldn't find anything [1], [2] to make a case for WP:MUSIC, and I surely did not. Wisdom89 (T / C) 19:08, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. andy (talk) 07:34, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep they definetly are notable and i completly agree with Holdmyfinger. they are the most well-known hardcore band in Scotland and just because hardcore is a fairly minor type of music does not mean they are not notable. And why is that other hardcore bands all seem to be notable on wikipedia but they have had little or no chart success.Andrew22k (talk) 11:57, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Comment. There's already been a definitive decision that the band is not notable as understood in Wikipedia, so that's not an argument for keeping this article. The question is, does this album meet the criteria for notability? andy (talk) 22:52, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Comment. Yes this album does 9/10 in Rock Sound magazineshows notability.
  • Delete when the band is a red link why would anyone rush to write the article on an album? Plus, the entry about the album doesn't have any real content anyways. Chimeric Glider (talk) 21:59, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment. 7. Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style or of the local scene of a city. Azriel are the most popular hardcore band in Glasgow and have been on the radio, hardcore is still a style there are many articles on hardcore bands. this discussion is more about the actual band so lets make it that.Andrew22k (talk) 22:20, 13 April 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.