Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Million Penguins
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep. utcursch | talk 05:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] A Million Penguins
Non-notable piece of shit; only has 491 articles, and not very well-known outside a small community. We don't have a page for ED, which has way more articles, why bother with this shit? Knighhtz 21:17, 1 April 2007 (UTC) — knighhtz (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
-
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:21, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep. Whoa. Pretty bad-faith nomination here, fairly interesting collaborative project by a well-known book publisher, has sources, etcetera. The rather strong language in this nomination is really uncalled for too, the account was made for the purpose of this AfD, and user has subsequently vandalized E.T. Adventure. Seems to be a troll for Encyclopedia Dramatica or something. Arkyan • (talk) 15:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Arkyan. I created this article. I believe this to be a bad faith nom. And Google hits are a poor way to judge notability. Dismas|(talk) 18:49, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy keep and close as a clear case of bad faith nom. --Dennisthe2 19:17, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep per everyone else. Acalamari 22:32, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete perhaps bad-faith nomination but subject matter is non-notable. Otherwise include sources (CNN, etc.) that have paid attention to this school project. --FateClub 22:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. This project has had a lot of press attention and therefore meets WP:WEB. Angela. 01:27, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.