Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Million Little Pieces (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deletion. RyanGerbil10(The people rejoice!) 05:17, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A Million Little Pieces (film)

There has been no activity in regards to this for quite some time now, and considering the chances of it actually going through with production I don't see why it should remain. If they do go ahead with production at some point then it should be re-added once it has become notable. R.E. Freak 05:09, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. "It is unknown whether they will move forward with this project." Then there's no basis for an article. It's not even a crystal ball. Fan-1967 05:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete into a million little pieces per nom and above. -- Gogo Dodo 06:13, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not even a crystal ball broken into a million little pieces. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 11:15, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Doesn't deserve its own article space for now. Remake article if movie is ever made. Thε Halo ^Θ 12:35, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge This can be covered on the book's page and split off if the movie ever happens. Ace of Sevens 12:48, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and Merge Put the information in the book's page for now. If theres only about a 1% chance there will be a movie, it doesn't need its own page. (Clamster5 18:26, 23 July 2006 (UTC))
• Keep, dare I say. It was definitely optioned, and certainly discussed, and however it pans out will be expandible. --badlydrawnjeff talk 00:46, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

• "Optioned" + "discussed" ≠ "actually made". Thousands of projects fall apart in Hollywood every year. That process is so common and routine that it is not worth noting. Fan-1967 01:28, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

• Not always, no. But sometimes, yes. --badlydrawnjeff talk 01:31, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

• It might be, if you could actually come up with a story on exactly how this one fell apart, and why this one did, and how that's significant. But right now it's just one more stalled project that may never happen. Recreate if that changes. Fan-1967 01:36, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. In Hollywood, "optioned" + "discussed" = "nothing". --Calton | Talk 06:50, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge the slice of information that a film was considered into the book article, if it's not already there. But there's no need for its own article and no need for a redirect. Jacqui^★ 14:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.