Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Hundred Monkeys

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 04:54, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] A Hundred Monkeys

A Hundred Monkeys (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable corporation with a few notable customers. Just borderline enough to avoid CSD, but strong probable conflict of interrest (article created, edited and de-prodded by SPA). Sources are provided, but coverage is incidental or trivial (and the articles do not have the corporation itself as the topic). — Coren ^(talk) 03:21, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, no evidence that the company meets WP:CORP. From what I can see, there are a few mentions in print here and there, but mostly in the sense of company naming in general and not about the company itself. The references are scant and don't seem to meet the multiple, non-trivial aspect of WP:RS. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:32, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete What Kinu said. Eusebeus 17:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Irk _{Come in for a drink!} 23:57, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom., and Kinu.--JayJasper 12:38, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.