Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Guide to Swiss Banking

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete (and do not transwikify). RobertG ♬ talk 10:09, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] A Guide to Swiss Banking Part 1 and Part 2

Reads like a magazine or book, transwiki to Wikibooks if eligible. Stifle 14:22, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete original research and clearly intended to be so. That was quick, you beat me to it by minutes :-) - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] (W) AfD? 14:27, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki or just Delete. I'm on the fence for this, since it almost reads like it was taken wholesale from a webpage or book making it a cpvio...but I don't have the time atm to search. --Syrthiss 14:57, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki. Part 1 of this article is currently on a site called Article Alley written by a chap called Fiorenzo Fontana. At the bottom of the article, it states: "This article is free for republishing." see (http://www.articlealley.com/article_18002_19.html). Capitalistroadster 16:39, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  • I have been unable to track down Part 2 yet but I suspect that is because it is too new for Google to index. Part 1 was only uploaded to Article Alley on Friday. Capitalistroadster 16:41, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
• If free for republishing means it's GFDL compatible, transwiki. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:42, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Comment. This isn't really suitable for Wikibooks. "Wikibooks is not a place for non-fiction books on any random subject you would like." Please stop sending us stuff that is not suitable. We are looking for academic resources. Jimbo has said that he wants WB to be for textbooks only, but that policy is currently under dispute at WB. To be safe, it may be wise to hold off on transwikiing non-textbook material for the time being. I'll keep you all updated. --LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 17:00, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete original research Avalon 09:09, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete again, orignial research. Don't move to wikibooks for reason given above. (sorry signed --Petros471 11:13, 10 December 2005 (UTC) )

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.