Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Gaming Brotherhood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete, CSD-A7. ➨ ЯЄDVERS 19:48, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A Gaming Brotherhood

Non-notable gaming group. Isomorphic 01:50, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. -- Scientizzle 01:51, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per A7, no evidence of notability--☆TBC☆ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 01:58, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep -- harryliuhao To whom it may concerned, I had reviewed wiki deletion criteria, and do not think the page meet any of the deletion criteria, such as paten nonsense, tested pages, pure vandalism etc.
  A Gaming Brotherhood was created by a group of level-minded gamers since Feb 2003. The group includes 500 members from over 15 countries, ranked in Top 10 of Battlefield gaming clans, and has high notibility among the gaming clans. I am setting up a framework of the page, which will be further developed and enhanced by other members.

Comment The criterion that this article matches is A7 which is unremarkable people/vanity page. You can find it here. Your clan having notability among gaming clans just means that an article like this would be more appropriate for a gaming clan wiki, if there is such a thing. SubSeven 07:50, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 02:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• DELETE ALL CLANS! Non-notable, vanity, spam, completely unencyclopedic. -- Kicking222 02:39, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete under A7. No notability presented in the article. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:52, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Some may argue there are notable clans. If there are, this isn't one. Fan1967 03:29, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The clan's website has no Alexa ranking, and a Google search turns up about 35 hits. — TheKMan^talk 03:30, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per nn group and vanity page.--Jersey Devil 03:50, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete clans should create home pages, not articles --MarsRover 04:41, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Completely unsourced and original research. JohnM4402 06:45, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per all the above. I'd quite like to see someone establish a guideline for gaming-related notability (something along the lines that there are probably a handful of famous gamers, and probably no actual clans, that are relevant to the world at large) so that it can be quickly pointed to in these situations. Seb Patrick 08:30, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy nn clan with no assertion of notabiliy MLA 10:46, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete. Couldn't be more vanity if it tried. Does anyone outside the gaming clan actually care about it? JIP | Talk 11:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, as per all above. Vizjim 13:53, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn clan. --Terence Ong 14:04, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per Kicking222 Crazynas 15:52, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Pwned Delete per nom. Dominick ^(TALK) 18:05, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.