Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Bad Dream (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, however a merge can be discussed on the talk page if needed. — CharlotteWebb 06:07, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A Bad Dream

The recent first AfD on this subject was overturned by DRV consensus in light of new information, for which, see the DRV. This matter is resubmitted to AfD for new consideration. This is a procedural relisting, so I abstain. Xoloz 17:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - total lack of notability --Orange Mike 21:00, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep It's been announced as a single, and Keane are a fairly big band, so it's most likely notable. --[kazikame] 21:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - scheduled single release by a notable band on a major label. Release date is confirmed officially by both the band site and Island Records, so WP:CRYSTAL doesn't come into play here. B.Wind 00:16, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per above. However, all speculative statements in the article (namely B-Sides and the mock cover) should be removed. Why is the article still protected? U-Mos 18:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• Note This article was accidentally left protected when the page was restored for AfD per DRV, I have removed the protection so as not to hinder this AfD. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 20:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - as per above. --Chappy84 21:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - has been officially announced MellonCollie 21:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• Strongest keep and definite - It has been announced, see? duh --Fluence 00:39, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - are all of you "keep" advocates saying that there should be a Wikipedia article for every "single release by a notable band on a major label" in the history of music? Because that's what your reasoning implies. --Orange Mike 01:40, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• Merge To a main album article. We have no reason to give this single its own article and the verifiable info we have on it makes the article a stub. If we then get more info we can consider splitting it off again. JoshuaZ 06:47, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• Response to comment - Yes, why shouldn't there be? U-Mos 18:40, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.