Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AXB Enterprises

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:38, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AXB Enterprises

AXB Enterprises (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

57 Google results; still ad-vanity a day after unsuccessful prodding. Slgrandson (page - messages - contribs) 22:49, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete db-corp. JuJube 23:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, because corporation with multiple Google results, which means an article can be sustained with sources. --164.107.223.217 00:13, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment This anonymous user has voted Keep in every AfD he's voted in. JuJube 00:17, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
So what? If I find one that I agree should be deleted, I promise that I will vote as such, but if I have a reason to keep, why not share it? Should I comment that you mostly vote to delete articles based on your recent history as evidence of something? --164.107.223.217 00:23, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, top Google results are Blogspot and MySpace, which are not reliable sources to "sustain" an article. --Dhartung | Talk 06:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete this vanispamcruftisement. MER-C 08:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, possibly by merging somewhere appropriate. For now the article lacks not only sources but also established context and WP links. Lay users won't understand the subject even if it was notable. --Futurano 19:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete No reliable sources. -- Whpq 16:19, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.