Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ASBL vlaams belang VZW

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. It's target has been deleted, so it's useless anyway. -Splashtalk 00:13, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ASBL vlaams belang VZW

Delete. The organisation exists, but mentioning it is not wikipedia worthy Intangible 10:28, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

  • ...and (whether notable or not) its just a redirect to a DAB page with a redlink. Delete ::Supergolden:: 12:46, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as nn. --Terence Ong 13:13, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - the dab page that it redirects to is up (and heading) for deletion as well MLA 13:29, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge - I think the (future) content of the article is relevant to wikipedia but it won't cover a full article, so maybe this should be inserted in the Vlaams Belang article in a separate heading. Julien Tuerlinckx 18:07, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand if only a little bit. While related to the Vlaams Belang this is a separate subject, and I think a short article would be warranted. People may want to link to this ASBL specifically and not to the article on the (much more important indeed) Vlaams Belang party, where the contents about this specific ASBL may be lost (unless of course we link to a heading rather than to the whole article). --FvdP 20:04, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: It's currently a redirect and should really be at WP:RFD. Stifle 22:23, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: The article it redirects to is also put up to be deleted. If that one goes, this redirect should become a candidate for speedy deletion anyway. But you are right, that technically I should have used a RfD. Intangible 17:35, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.