Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AOL chatroom game

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A7 doesn't apply, but there's a clear consensus here that this is WP:OR and non-notable. Krimpet (talk) 09:25, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AOL chatroom game

AOL chatroom game (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable class of web games. Completely original research that lacks any sources. Fails WP:NOR, WP:N and WP:V. Does not assert reasons for notability, so possibly a candidate for speedy deletion per CSD A7. Chardish 05:42, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Lacking sources should mean a cleanup, not a deletion. --Zeno McDohl (talk) 06:12, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
    • I clarified my reasons to support deletion. - Chardish 13:34, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete It doesn't merely lack sources. The whole foundation for the article is shaky. It's unverified and probably unverifiable for the history portion, and no notability through external sources is shown. Of the nine external links, none relates to notability. YechielMan 09:34, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete Looks like an A7 case of complete lack of notability asserted, topped off with original research. --Wingsandsword 13:54, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete — I believe the key phrase here is "although they have no official names". Delete as OR. ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠιмυМ ≈ √∞ 18:11, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
    No vote, just came here while clearing speedy backlogs - this is not a speedy. Neil ╦ 21:28, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete per nom. --JayJasper 18:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • If several users say that it's a speedy with no opinion to the contrary, doesn't that consensus trump an administrator's opinion? - Chardish 01:39, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.