Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ANGELICA HOPES

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ѕandahl 05:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] ANGELICA HOPES

ANGELICA HOPES (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Asserts notability as poet, but doesn't identify the supposed awards she has received. Article cites no sources. Also, written in a promotional/gushy tone. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

• WEAK KEEP Clearly needs a lot of work, but asserts notability with awards, if external refs can be supplied to verify Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:28, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Created by what seems to be a single purpose account. Seems to be self-promotion or spam. I don't get any Google hits that assert notability. Doesn't meet WP:BIO and possibly in vio of WP:COI Doc Strange (talk) 15:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Also there's this at the bottom of the page "There has been numerous Wikipedia search for writers and authors for Angelica Hopes name so Writers Club have included her biography here in Wikipedia." This can't be verified. Who are "Writers Club" (who are also the user who made this article)? I'm really leaning towards WP:SPAM here Doc Strange (talk) 15:32, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete as nn-bio, with a side of WP:SPAM. This so-called "club" (a role account) has no other topics. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:47, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Classic self-promotional autobio. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 16:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. "Angelica Hopes" gets minimal G hits, and I don't see much of relevence besides an official site, which this article seems to be heavily based on [1]. These so-called awards that she's won are unidentified and unreferenced, so no real claim of notabilty there either. Even assuming good faith by the creator, this article fails WP:BIO. PC78 (talk) 18:15, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete promotional article by SPA, claims of notability but no solid refs. JohnCD (talk) 19:36, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.