Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AMCDeathKnight

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:55, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] AMCDeathKnight

Internet users are not inherently encyclopedic, and I see nothing which makes this one an exception. Sjakkalle 06:35, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Agree with above. Cnwb 06:38, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not the Who's who Glaurung 07:30, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • I disagree, in that Wikipedia's contents should include the equivalent of Who's Who. I agree, however, that this person most definitely isn't in. Chris 21:13, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is a directory of players of video games targeted to 10-14 year olds. -Casito 09:29, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Funny, I though wikipedia was an encyclopedia (Perhaps you forgot a not? :) ). Delete. Thue | talk 10:10, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • There was supposed to be a not in there somewhere. I guess I should have gone to sleep a few hours before that edit. -Casito 23:47, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
    • I thought it was a very cute typo :). Thue | talk 14:32, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Clear cut vanity case. Securiger 11:31, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity. Dsmdgold 17:26, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity. Mrwojo 16:00, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Ick. Some vanity. The title sounds like an American Motors show car. Delete as some kind of vanity. - Lucky 6.9 02:22, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity/non-notable. —Seselwa 09:50, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - vanity. SteveW 18:09, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.