Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ACT Improv

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Malcolm^{Use the schwartz!} 00:30, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ACT Improv

ACT Improv (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article about improv group. No references, no claim to notability, reads like an ad for Monday nights at the George and Dragon Restaurant. Future Fun Jumper (TIC) 00:05, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

• delete per WP:MUSIC, WP:ORG, WP:N, WP:V, and, of course, WP:CHEESE. completely non-notable. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 00:10, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. I think Niffweed17 listed all of the possible policy arguments in favor for deletion already. — Pious7_Talk^Contribs 01:15, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. The nom is right, it sounds like a promo ad. --Dennisthe2 01:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per previous voters. Google seems to be revealing nothing notable (except wikipedia mirrors). --Ybbor^T 02:50, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
• delete per ybbor, there is a lack of reliable source material from which an encyclopedia article can be written. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 04:22, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Niffweed17 and WP:ADVERT.--Paloma Walker 04:53, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as non notable, and per Niffweed17. CattleGirl ^{talk | sign! | review me} 10:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per everybody. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:10, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.