Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A55RGY

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mackensen (talk) 04:44, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] A55RGY

Delete. I'm hard pressed to see the encyclopedic value here. Despite the fact that this number plate has been mentioned on the Internet, no less. -- Egil 16:16, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

OTOH, we do have Dick Assman; is A55RGY less noteworthy, and if so, is it enough to be deleted? Acb 16:55, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete If anyone thinks it's funny enough, it could go to BJAODN. And yes, I think it's fair to say the A55RGY is considerably less noteworthy than Dick Assman (though I'd have nothing against moving it to BJAODN, too). -- Mwanner 21:28, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable. Dsmdgold 01:46, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. Megan1967 01:58, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, i live in Sweden and have still heard about it. // Liftarn 07:32, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with last paragraph of License plate#Plate numbering and lettering, which discusses this type of issue, and redirect A55RGY there. / Uppland 07:40, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Merge, agree with Uppland.-gadfium 00:45, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - very not notable. It is an example of something and not something in itself. - Tεxτurε 22:27, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN. Stupid enough to keep. Linuxbeak 01:58, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.