Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.C. Bastia 1924

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep - per consensus. Non-admin closure; EJF (talk) 19:28, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] A.C. Bastia 1924

A.C. Bastia 1924 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

The subject is not notable. Google search just brings up lists. I can't find any media coverage. The article was previously speedy deleted. Theymos (talk) 11:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

  • This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related page moves. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:36, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment. What level is IV Serie (Serie D) in Italian football? Because if it's high enough for notability, it's a keep, otherwise delete. Peanut4 (talk) 13:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Serie D is the highest non-professional division in Italy, whereas Eccellenza (i.e., where the team currently plays) is the second-highest. --Angelo (talk) 13:53, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep but please improve it and expand it. The article is in a very awful state right now. --Angelo (talk) 13:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - the team played at a high enough level for it to be considered notable. Definitely a poor article, though. matt91486 (talk) 16:26, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep - verifiable club but dire English and structure in the article. Someone who knows both football and English needs to look at it. Pete Fenelon (talk) 17:26, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Only one sentence. I would have tagged this with CSD-A7. J.delanoygabsadds 23:36, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep The club has played at Serie D, which, given the number of Serie D club articles, appears to be considered notable, although I haven't seen any discussion about it here. That said, if the English pyramid is notable down to level 10, the top amateur level of Italian football should be considered notable. --Balerion (talk) 18:39, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. This is a team that has played at a high enough level to be notable, and the article was never in an "awful" or "poor" state, it was just a stub waiting to be expanded, like 40% of other Wikipedia articles. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
    • Well, it actually was. I cleaned it up a reasonable amount to get it to an effective stub state. matt91486 (talk) 06:27, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.