Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A-Z of mutants

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:05, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A-Z of mutants

Unneeded list, all info here is covered in Category:Marvel Comics mutants, List of X-Men teams, and Decimation (comics), and subsequent main articles about its characters. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 02:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

By the way, it appears this "A-Z" list is more of a "A-B" list. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 02:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, incomplete, original research, unverifiable. --Terence Ong _{(Chat | Contribs)} 02:30, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• delete bad name. ReverendG 02:37, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep or merge Merge with Mutant (comics) or something or just keep it. I find the information valuable and encyclopedic. Try to find some citations and it will be great. Konman72 02:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete table is neato but all those characters are in Category:Marvel Comics mutants. the info is already there. this is unnecessary. Somerset219 03:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep or merge — per Konman72 American Patriot 1776 05:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete- There is no need for it considering the information already exists on the other pages listed. -X22oo 05:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Plus, the title is misleading in that it sounds like it's about nonfictional mutants. Doczilla 08:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge or Rename as per nom and Konman72.—Ben FrantzDale 12:25, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- stubblyhead | ^T/_c 15:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This does not fulfill Wikipedia's naming conventions, and there are already similar articles that supply similar information. - Thorne N. Melcher 17:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The nominator is correct, this list is redundant.  Cdcon  17:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, redundant, fails WP:NOR and WP:V. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 19:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --Peta 00:48, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete but let's do it for the right reasons. WP:OR and WP:V are not violated. There is no original research unless collating freely available information is research (actually, isn't collating freely available information called making an encyclopaedia?). The article is fully verifiable, there is nothing made up on the page. It should be deleted simply because it's repetition of information contained elsewhere. Mallanox 02:19, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --Chris Griswold 05:53, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.