Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9-9-1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 20:19, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 9-9-1

No useful information, this is the number for the Malaysian Defense Services DDerby 22:04, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

changed vote to keep but keeping it open for vote since Malaysia has a much smaller population, is not an English-speaking country, and thus has less inherent significance. DDerby 05:45, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not quite as relevant to myself as 911 --Asriel86 00:26, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
    • If someone calls 9-9-1 and sics a Malaysian airstrike upon you, you'll probably find it relevant. Are you within a thousand kilometres of an MDS base? Barno 03:26, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Not much scope for expansion Dsmdgold 02:09, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, not encyclopaedic. Megan1967 04:55, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, on behalf of all the Malaysians to whom this is relevant myself to whom this is interesting. Has plenty of scope for expansion, as 9-1-1 demonstrates. Kappa 05:14, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Why aren't the Malaysians speaking up for themselves? Megan1967 05:42, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • OK forget them :) Kappa 23:44, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, agree with Kappa. ugen64 05:41, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak keep not because of the subject but because of the near-incomprehensability of the current version. Agree this is a prime candidate for "organic growth."  :) - Lucky 6.9 05:47, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, no content, not encyclopedic. RickK 05:56, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, Wikipedia is not a phone book. Martg76 12:13, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:WIN. Radiant_* 09:11, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, it must be quite important to Malaysians. Delete Grue 06:59, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete not relevant CatCrofts 13:11, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, unencyclopedic. Concur with Martg76. VladMV ٭ talk 22:10, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, not encyclopedic. Alex.tan 16:44, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, seems worthy merely of dictionary entry. CharlesPence 6:28, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.