Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/828 Entertainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as spam (G11). Sr13 05:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 828 Entertainment

828 Entertainment (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable production company, has been deleted by an admin and speedy-nommed by two non admins, but User:Stephen deleted the speedy deletion nom twice, so here we are. This is spam. Corvus cornix 02:35, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete G11 and prevent recreation. It's pretty clear we'll never see a neutral point of view. YechielMan 03:45, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, as of 2007 this company fails on Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Unsure if we can to use WP:CSD. Carlosguitar 04:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Notability means nothing if the article is spam. An assertion of notability only protects an article from an A7 speedy. If other categories are still applicable, then the article should still be speediable under that category. This is a G11 speedy candidate as SPAM. DarkAudit 04:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: Not to be nasty, but if the company deserved a wikipedia article, surely it could pay for it's own hosting (i.e. not through Lycos). Bradybd 04:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.