Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/6th density

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Robert 00:59, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 6th density

• Delete. Vanity cruft. Author's similar handiwork may be found at Cassiopean (now deleted), Laura Knight-Jadczyk, and Cassiopaeans. - Sensor 23:54, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. A cut and paste from this site. -- Foofy 02:50, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. As per above.  freshgavin^TALK   05:38, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. A waste of energy that could be more creatively used elsewhere in Wikipedia. But then again, looking at the user's history, possibly not. - Just zis Guy, you know? 14:21, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy as copyvio per above User:Purplefeltangel/sig 20:27, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable crackpottery (if not copyvio). MCB 21:27, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.