Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/67 (sex position)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Coredesat 06:32, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 67 (sex position)

67 (sex position) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete as NomOnly ref is urban dictionary. Appears to be non-notable neologism.No evidence provided of widespread usage. Horrorshowj (talk) 03:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NEO. Just a variant of the "68" joke (George Carlin?). JJL (talk) 03:54, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Merge In my opinion it should be merged into the 68-position as a variantOlliyeah (talk) 14:09, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Why would this need to be included in an encyclopedia? ~NeonFire372~ (talk) 19:55, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I have never heard of it, nor has a google search produced good results. There are no references either. --Astroview120mm 06:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as nom. Wikipedia is not for things you made up in... well, I hope you didn't. The Wednesday Island (talk) 13:39, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.