Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5th world art

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Article was deleted as blatant advertising by User:Anonymous Dissident. Nick Dowling (talk) 09:16, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 5th world art

5th world art (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Blatant conflict of interest and oiginal research. Apparently something the author made up themselves. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaleidoscopography. J Milburn (talk) 02:00, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

• Strong delete Blatant conflict of interest indeed, given the commentary at the bottom of the page. User is clearly new-ish and doesn't understand policies it seems; nonetheless, this is a non-notable neologism. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:06, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as WP:OR and self-promotion by User:5thworldart. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaleidoscopography. -- Kesh (talk) 02:29, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - not a notable concept - no evidence of significant coverage by reliable, independent sources. Guest9999 (talk) 02:33, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable, no evidence of coverage by sources independent of the subject. Massively COI. And um, I hate to break this to you, sir or madam, but there was no web in 1982. DarkAudit (talk) 02:48, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete a COI with WP:OR on the side and a lack of reliable sources. Possibly hoax or at the very least made up. Doc Strange^{Mailbox Orbitting Black Hole}Strange Frequencies 03:22, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - Neologism with a healthy dose of self-promotion. // Chris ^{(complaints)•(contribs)} 04:18, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - Self-promotion, and OR. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 07:42, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.