Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5 Minute Walk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Shanel 22:03, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 5_Minute_Walk

Delete - not notable per WP:MUSIC, vanity entry Funkymuskrat 07:04, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, vanity band. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 10:32, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Read the article carefully; it's not a band, it's a record label, and it's a record label that sports quite a few artists notable enough to have Wikipedia entries. StarryEyes 10:45, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep per the difference between a music label and a band. Falls under WP:CORP not WP:MUSIC. - Turnstep 15:03, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep -- appears notable. Odd that the official website for the label appears to focus on just one band, which is not even listed in the WP article -- but I found plenty of references to the label. Powers 15:21, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep -- Powers, Roper is listed on the Wiki article as the only band currently signed to them. Thus why they only feature Roper on the site. STAREYe 18:38, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - as others have noted this is an independent record label, not a band and therefore doesn't fall under WP:Music. Dan, the CowMan 20:52, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep, per Turnstep. Adrian Lamo · (talk) · (mail) · 01:53, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep warpozio 10:44, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.