Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5T(Asian)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 05:14, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 5T(Asian)

This afd nomination was incomplete. Listing now. No opinion. —Cryptic (talk) 05:14, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

• Keep and clean up in a huge way. There appears to be a lot of news coverage from Australia when one looks for "'5T' 'Asian gang'" on Google. I'm not sure how lasting an impact they're going to have, but they're somewhat notable. Devotchka 05:31, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and clean up. Alphax ^τεχ 06:19, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Alphax ^τεχ 06:21, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep According to this Sydney Morning Herald article for 2002, they were active around Cabramatta and led to a Parliamentary Inquiry see [1]. They were thought to have split into several gangs. Capitalistroadster 06:36, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable outside of the context of Vietnamese street gangs in Sydney. That broader issue would be a neat article tho. Dxco 06:41, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and Mention under Macquarie Fields Keep rewritten well Prashanthns 14:13, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, notable. Kappa 15:06, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, terrible article at present and needs renaming anyway, but the topic is certainly notable. --Stormie 23:29, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• I have cleaned up and expanded the article. Should be moved to 5T if kept. No change of vote from Keep. Capitalistroadster 05:25, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable, and its existence helps address systemic bias. Jacqui ^{★ 05:31, 29 October 2005 (UTC)}
• Keep. Notable organised crime gang from major city. -- Cnwb 23:55, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, with more editing and a rename should be an interesting article. pfctdayelise 23:58, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, notable and referenced -- Ian ≡ talk 00:31, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, NPOV, verifiable. Snottygobble | Talk 01:04, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.