Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5078 Yonge Street

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deleled; closing old discussion. Renata 09:25, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 5078 Yonge Street

Not notable, if anything, and if kept could be used as a violation of WP:POINT. A search for "5078 Yonge Street" returns 0 hits. [[User:Mysekurity|Mysekurity]] [[additions | e-mail]] 01:35, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Note: this article is now a redirect; the redirect has been nominated for deletion. Please see Redirects for deletion. Mindmatrix 16:19, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. Appears to be a non-notable office building. Article doesn't even say where it is. -- Necrothesp 02:01, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
  • I've redirected it. Zanimum 02:20, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Still Delete Not so useful redirect for a nn office building to a town --JAranda | watz sup 02:21, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, but I think it's supposed to be about 5075 Yonge Street, if the web link is anything to go by. Kappa 03:11, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Allright, but then this article should be deleted. I'm not sure how this building is notable enough. It has 422 Google results, but they're mostly about the space. I don't know if the strongest inclusionist could argue that this should stay. Maybe the little information it has could go under the header of where it's redirecting to? -[[User:Mysekurity|Mysekurity]] [[additions | e-mail]] 03:28, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Yes I mean "keep as a redirect", which means renaming it. Kappa 03:34, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
Okay, but why keep it as a redirect? Do you honestly think anyone is going to look for or link to this article? I understand redirects are cheap and all, and maybe I should bring this up at RfD, now that it's a redirect, but if the address is even incorrect, why would anyone find anything useful here? Who is going to search for a building with little significance in an ENCYCLOPEDIA and type in the incorrect street address? Fine by me if you want to redirect 5075 Yonge Street, as much as I disagree, but I really don't think an incorrect address redir is needed. I welcome your comments. -[[User:Mysekurity|Mysekurity]] [[additions | e-mail]] 04:01, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Specifically, move this redirect to 5075 Yonge Street, then delete the original wrong redirect. Kappa 04:10, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for reconsidering. While I consider myself neither deletionist nor inclusionist, I can respect the view of an inclusionist such as yourself. It's a shame that you turned down adminship, as I'd gladly support you should you choose to run. Keeping this post relevant to the topic, I agree that this page should be deleted, but the redirect you proposed is another battle for another day. Thanks, [[User:Mysekurity|Mysekurity]] [[additions | e-mail]] 04:21, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Is this a notable landmark of some sort? If so, merge particular elements with Yonge Street or Toronto (or similar); in any event, nix it. E Pluribus Anthony 10:21, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete or merge with a parent article. There is not enough info here to justify an article. --maclean25 05:20, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.