Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/427 (number)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedied Wikibofh 15:04, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 427 (number)

Nonsense. Do I really have to give a reason for deletion? Doesn't this article speak for itself? linas 04:51, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

  • Speedy patent nonsense —Wahoofive (talk) 05:09, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - article fails to note important facts, e.g. 427 comes after 426, and yet before 428 (and even farther before 429).  BD2412 talk 05:14, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete and have a Centralized discussions on Numbers way to many is being nominated recently --JAranda | yeah 05:18, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Qaz (talk) 05:56, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete, nonsense. — JIP | Talk 06:50, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect to 400 (number). In accordance to Wikipedia:WikiProject Numbers policy there should be articles for every 100 in this range. -- Egil 07:12, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
    • And those articles are 300 (number), 400 (number), 500 (number), 600 (number), 700 (number), 800 (number), and 900 (number). WikiProject Numbers only talks about those numbers and does not state that numbers in between them, such as this one, should have articles. According to what WikiProject Numbers actually says, this is a delete, plain and simple. Whether the project should say something about redirects for the numbers in between the multiples of 100 is something that should be taken up on the project's talk page. Uncle G 12:38, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
    • Comment: Fair enough: having a redirect is IMHO a good way to ensure the articles will not be recreated. -- Egil 12:55, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect per Egil. — RJH 15:27, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.