Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/40 Winks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel Case 02:35, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 40 Winks

40 Winks (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article is not notable Woggy 16:51, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

40 Winks should be deleted because the game is not notable, And it is not well known. (Woggy 17:26, 22 July 2007 (UTC))

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:45, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep It has 100,000 Google hits and plenty of available sources. Shalom Hello 12:49, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep Game has had more than enough coverage in reliable sources. Wildthing61476 13:17, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep The game was released on the psone and besides Nintendo Power the UK Nintendo Magazine System and N64 magazine both reviewed the game stating a release date, a month after the issues were released. It was also one of the few N64 game to feature single player co-op and use the expansion pak. Atirage 14:07, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Orinoco Keep "40 winks" +N64 gets 10000 google hits, so seems notable enough. Totnesmartin 14:13, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Snowball keep, I don't know that much about video games, but this one sure seems to be notable enough. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 16:45, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep A single mention by Gamespy alone is sufficient as a reliable source, since Gamespy is an authoritative gaming website.--Kylohk 01:43, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep - The nomination was presumably made in good faith, but there is simply no justification to delete this article, and the nomination reason provided is false. Deletion should be closed within 24 hours.--WaltCip 01:47, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.