Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3d simulation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to virtual reality. Royboycrashfan 12:52, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3d simulation

Reads like an advertisement, there is already an article for virtual reality which is better than this one, NPOV.--Zxcvbnm 02:26, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. No need to delete - should redirect to vr. For great justice. 02:28, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep or Redirect to virtual reality. Royboycrashfan 02:30, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep or Redirect to virtual reality.YellowPigNowNow 03:56, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep or redirect to Virtual reality. --Terence Ong 10:44, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect to virtual reality. No need to have an ad in the edit history. --Rory096 23:05, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and do not redirect - 3d simulation covers things other than virtual reality. 3D CAD and 3D molecular modeling, for example, are not virtual reality, but they are 3d simulation. Johntex\^talk 00:49, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect per Rory096. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 2006-04-06 03:57Z
• strong keep at face value this may look like a fork to 3d or virtual reality but I think is is its own class so strong keep. --CyclePat 04:01, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect per Rory 096. Fishhead64 05:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.