Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/367 (number)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Doc (?) 08:38, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 367 (number)

I thought Atlas Shrugged was a great book, but that doesn't warrant an article about the number. Trovatore 22:19, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete --Trovatore 14:29, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Number articles typically grow as more trivia is attached to them and nonsense (such as the info currently listed) eliminated, but per precedent (I believe) they are limited and this falls outside the boundary. Delete Dottore So 23:00, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as unencyclopedic trivia. MCB 00:36, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete nn. How about Infinity plus 1 (number)? Andrew pmk | Talk 01:28, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per Wikipedia is not infinite — Paul August ☎ 01:52, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, keeping this and establishing a precedent would logically make the current American school Zerg rush look like a drop in the ocean. --Last Malthusian 08:42, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete -- Egil 13:05, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
  • I thought Atlas Shrugged was a terrible book, so delete this article out of spite for me having read all that bologna. Also, an unenyclopaedic number. Lord Bob 15:16, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge/Redirect to 300 (number). — RJH 22:48, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
    • Hey, that's not bad. I didn't know it had all the nums 300-399. --Trovatore 05:46, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect, do not merge. The factlets on that list go down to the area code of Wyoming. This, however, is less important. Septentrionalis 03:29, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect. linas 00:15, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect.--Kross 06:15, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - nn -- Arthur Rubin (talk) 00:55, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Strong keep real number keep and allow for organic growth. Klonimus 02:53, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.