Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/318, Inc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete 318, Inc & Reptools, no consensus on Charles Edge — Caknuck 19:02, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 318, Inc and others

318, Inc (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Reptools (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Charles Edge (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Delete non-notable company and orders. JP321 12:16, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete nn company, product and person. Carlossuarez46 22:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete 318 and Reptools. Company page borders on being ad/PR copy, and its assertion of notability ("largest") is only cited by company's own webpage (a page that doesn't even support this claim!). 'Product assertion of notability ("used by most of the film production companies" or even "popular") isn't supported at all. Neutral on Charles Edge. Seems to have a decent number of biblio credits, but not sure how outstanding any of them are or if he is considered an expert in his field. DMacks 16:24, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete 318 and Reptools; weak keep Charles Edge. The company and product articles fail verifiability; there are no independent reliable sources cited in the article. Edge's article remedies that failing, though I don't see anything in the article that provides a very clear claim of his notability. The authoring might. I feel that's better addressed with article cleanup right now than deletion. —C.Fred (talk) 16:42, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable -- Niaz^{(Talk • Contribs)} 07:21, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete for both 318 and Reptools per lack of notability. Reptools was already deleted twice in late-August.--JForget 01:16, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.