Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/30mins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:14, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 30mins

30mins (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Tagged in February as failing notability guidelines, no independent sources have ever been included to support the rather tenuous claim of notability. Created by TinaChong (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) who has no other contributions before or since, save to link this to a high-level article on editorial cartooning. The entire thing appears to be original research and the subject does not appear to be notable. Cruftbane 20:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete This user has not created anything else, just soley worked on this article, which leads me to believe this is an single purpose account.--NightRider63 02:01, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

• Comment WP:SPA is not a rationale for deletion. --Dhartung | Talk 06:49, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, fails WP:N. (But unreferenced is not the same thing as original research.) --Dhartung | Talk 06:49, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Dhartung. Stifle (talk) 20:55, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.