Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2nd II None

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Bratsche^talk 03:55, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 2nd II None

Tagged as speedy, but article notes they have released two albums and thus may pass the guidelines for inclusion for musicians. Abstaining. brenneman^{T}{L} 11:10, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete fails to meet WP:MUSIC criteria. --Terence Ong 11:33, 11 February 2006 (UTC) Looks like I've to change my vote, since it appears on iTunes Music Store. So keep. --Terence Ong 14:13, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and improve, appears to be notable. Lot's of results on Google [1] and are covered by significant media [2] Paul Carpenter 12:12, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - seem to meet notability guidelines. 1999 release on Arista. Album included in iTunes. All Music guide bio/reviews.... —ERcheck @ 13:18, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as meeting our musical notability guidelines. Capitalistroadster 23:46, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Could I ask than the information above be put into the article? - brenneman^{T}{L} 01:18, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I've added some of the relevant evidence. Keep. --Metropolitan90 06:58, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.