Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2 Much

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and protect. --Tikiwont (talk) 09:51, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 2 Much

2 Much (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Nom - speeded once already; fails WP:BAND. Rklawton 01:52, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete: Per nom (doesn't meet BAND). - Rjd0060 04:59, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete: I got a little turned around on this one... It almost meets criteria 6 for ensembles in WP:BAND. But criteria 6 applies to members of the group... not founders and managers. Might meet criteria 11 because of the single on TRL and BET? -- Swerdnaneb 07:38, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 17:25, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, unless the article can be expanded with proper sourcing. Band does indeed fail WP:MUSIC, as far as I can determine after looking through google for a while. With only one album and no charts, it seems that criteria #1 and #11 are their best shots, but I can't find anything to satisfy either of those. If they release a 2nd album, they might be able to make a case, if Music World Music is a major indie label. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:12, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. If deleted then salt; it has been speedy'd three times already, and has had numerous contributors, anon and logged-in. On the other hand, perhaps that suggests fame? Rigadoun (talk) 00:43, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
    • comment Perhaps, but as WP:N specifies, "The topic of an article should be notable, or 'worthy of notice'. This concept is distinct from 'fame', 'importance', or 'popularity'". --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:16, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.