Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2Moons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 14:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 2Moons

2Moons (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable website which doesn't even exist yet. Fails WP:WEB. Corvus cornix 21:25, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete merely on the grounds that it doesn't exist yet. Even so, it still lacks notability. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 21:37, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and userfy as it'll likely need to be recreated in a year or two. JJL 04:53, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - WP:CRYSTAL would seem to apply here. Tony Fox (arf!) 04:53, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Changing to keep as per further discussion below. Tony Fox (arf!) 18:19, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment - Please advise, I'm confused. The article refers to MMORPG; the official website states it's a normal MMORPG with a downloadable client. I already declined CSD A7 on the grounds that it 1) appears NOT to be a website and 2) has notability in that it's developed by what-has-become-of Acclaim, an once great game house. So what's going on? --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 08:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Right, so I'm not hallucinating. Keep, obviously, then - seems like it satisfies notability. Article may need cleanup and other improvement though, but AfD is not Cleanup™. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 17:51, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - The closed beta had already attracted 200000 players, the involvement of David Perry and Howard Marks gives it sufficient notablity. There are multiple sources on this game, including its development history and its advertising model. [1][2][3][4] etc. - hahnchen 12:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. hahnchen 12:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep with integration of RPG Vault, Next-Gen and Firing Squad interviews pointed out by Hahnchen. Article needs a good cleanup though; looks like every section needs stripping and re-writing along with an external link cleanup. Marasmusine 14:25, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep With clean up. I participated in the CB and there is a lot of hype among MMORPG fans waiting for this game.
• Keep - relibale sources vailable, but could use a good copy edit for the content. -- Whpq

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.