Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2H

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:23, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 2H

2H (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

orphan. vanity page. only citation is the myspace page. Clubmarx 05:36, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, no sources and no indication of satisfyint WP:N. meshach 06:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep looks legit. Sources are hard to find due to shortness of name. SolidPlaid 06:11, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per lack of coverage in third party sources. I scoured the 'net and news articles for both his name and exhibition names, also external links from his MySpace, and came up with nada. If someone else finds reliable sources I am open to keep. ~Eliz81^(C) 06:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete he may actually exist, but I couldn't find anything that made me believe this artist is in any way notable.Balloonman 06:27, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as non notable unless sources cntrary to that are provided. Nuttah68 09:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. —Ethicoaestheticist 10:27, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Hummer - oh no, that's H2 - Delete Tiptopper 01:29, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

• delete good page .... but no independent notability Victuallers 09:54, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.