Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2Design
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 23:26, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 2Design
Content not suitable for an encyclopedia. User adds mostly nonsense and copyvio material to articles. This article seems to be another attempt at the nonsense since the article give no indication of what "2Design" is in relation to the article. I already forgot talk 08:22, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This looks like cut and paste from another Wiki article. In any case, it has nothing whatsoever to do with "2Design." Deranged bulbasaur 08:43, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I can't find anything like it. Maybe it's a dump from a proprietary database? It's not formatted as a journal article, but it might be some kind of synopsis. Deranged bulbasaur 08:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- If you look at the creation of the article [1] and look at places like the national library of medicine, you will find a page [2] that has portions of exactly the same text as what was added to help create the article. The article is then systematically edited to change some of the info and to add personal comments, research citations, etc. I've hit the user with copyvio tags so I'm sure they know now to make changes to the article in order to make it difficult to search the research articles online. The ultimate question is (besides the copyvio and WP:OR), what does the article have to do with "2Design"? -- I already forgot talk 09:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I can't find anything like it. Maybe it's a dump from a proprietary database? It's not formatted as a journal article, but it might be some kind of synopsis. Deranged bulbasaur 08:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom.Mmoneypenny 09:18, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as OR and nonsense. Track the author as well. He seems to have an history regarding psychoactive drug articles. DarkAudit 13:49, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. As a note, the author's similar articles are already being dealt with through AfD's and I'm sure plenty of people are keeping an eye out. -Cquan (talk, AMA Desk) 23:09, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Not for WP, but not bad as student notes on readings or lecture . I think I know where t he title came from. this is probably Lecture 2 on Design of these drugs, or Readings notes page 2. DGG 06:51, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
