Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2AM-BBS
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. east.718 at 01:38, January 21, 2008
[edit] 2AM-BBS
NN BBS Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 01:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 13:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, no evidence of notability. Terraxos (talk) 22:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. The statement "copies of this software were in use world-wide" seems to be a claim of notability, and http://www.google.com/search?q=2AM-BBS shows several ghits. --Eastmain (talk) 03:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pastordavid (talk) 21:36, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nomination. By the way, what's with the irrelevant external link? -- Mikeblas (talk) 23:35, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- Although it claims to be notable, there are no sources provided to confirm this, thus putting the article in violation of both the notability and verifiability guidelines. As a side note to the nomintaor, please be a bit more expansive in further AfD noms. "NN BBS" doesn't give much rationale, and to someone who is not familiar with wikijargon, means nothing. seresin wasn't he just...? 00:57, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as per nomination. Can't find any secondary sources on this one... — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 05:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- 'Keep Based on http://www.archive.org/details/bbs_documentary there will be sources. The ghits seem to indicate that it was in fact widely used, though not the very most commmon software. All major software from the period should be covered in WP.DGG (talk) 17:54, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
