Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/24 Hour Knowledge Factory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 01:31, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 24 Hour Knowledge Factory

24 Hour Knowledge Factory (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This is blatant spam created by a pair of single purpose accounts ConfuciusOrnis 07:03, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete - without prejudice to recreation. Spammy article that sounds like it comes from a Dilbert cartoon Part Deux 17:47, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as spam. So tagged. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 19:46, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as it's spam. Acalamari 20:27, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per above. Lemonsawdust 21:30, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
• comment - this isn't anything to spam. At best it's a concept that's written like a business paper, and it mgiht actually be worthy of inclusion, but I have to do more research first. --badlydrawnjeff talk 23:00, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Noted. Can you hit my talk page if you find something? I'll change my mind if you can. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 01:35, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete or redirect to "offshoring" - although it would be a shame to lose an article that's had so much written on it, it boils down to saying "people in different time zones are awake at different times" in 10000 words - iridescenti (talk to me!) 10:00, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Part Deux. obvious spam. ffm ✎talk 13:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.