Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/22 Coxwell (TTC)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)    15:14, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 22 Coxwell (TTC)

non-notable, wikipedia isn't a tour guide, bus routes are not worthy of seperate articles RMHED 21:29, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

What I should say is that User:Nlsanand removed the content from the Coxwell article to create this article (I recently restored it). I don't think that each bus route rates a separate article. Bus route information, if any, should be placed on the station article where the route starts. --Atrian 12:14, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • While I agree that bus routes are non-notable and should be merged into the articles on the terminal stations, I also need to point out that there are other bus routes with articles as well: 25 Don Mills, 64 Main, 70 O'Connor, 72 Pape, 81 Thorncliffe Park, 91 Woodbine, 92 Woodbine South, as well as another 130 routes listed at Toronto buses and trolley buses which don't have articles yet but are obviously intended to if User:Nlsanand continues this. We need to treat these equivalently to each other; either they all go or they all stay. Deleting one while leaving the rest intact is not acceptable. Delete all, but failing that, keep this. And again, I live in Toronto, so User:Nlsanand can keep his accusations of anti-Canadian bias to himself. Bearcat 19:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete unless there's something notable about this route. Bus routes change too often. --Usgnus 19:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete — as above — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 01:35, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Individual bus routes can and do change. An overview list of routes is sufficient. Kirjtc2 10:36, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Not encyclopedic. Misterjerk2 13:51, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.