Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/20th century fashion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. JIP | Talk 07:17, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 20th century fashion

Reads as original research, tagged as speedy "already covered at corset" which is not a speedy criterion as far as I know. Bringing to AfD. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 13:51, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. No citations, misleading title, orphan and dead-end article... and yes, it does sound like original research. - squibix 16:18, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The speedy was quite spot on, whyc should such a drivel take space here? Pavel Vozenilek 21:17, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. per nom. Incognito 00:00, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete that isn't a speedy criteria? :) KillerChihuahua^?!? 22:12, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.