Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/20thCC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-17 09:20Z

[edit] 20thCC

20thCC (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article says this is a company with two people that just added a third. No independent references provided. Recommend deleting as per reasoning presented in WP:INCLUSION and WP:N Dugwiki 17:12, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Appears to fail WP:N, WP:A Christopher Jost 18:03, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:N and violates WP:SPAM, therefore delete, if not speedy delete. Nenyedi ^TalkContribs_@ 21:36, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Completely out of place.--Parsleyjones 01:56, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- per nomination --Keesiewonder ^talk 02:55, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete No refs no evidence of notability, seems to be a hoax NBeale 07:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete As per nomination Flowerpotman ^talk-_{wot I've done} 04:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.