Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/201 (number)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Tawker 21:37, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 201 (number)

Non-notable number, previously prodded, deprodded and reprodded so it has to be AfD. Only claim to fame is that its the first non-notable number in wikipedia which violates a policy on avoiding self reference. This could set a dangerious precident as the Interesting number paradox could be applied to make all numbers notable. Salix alba (talk) 20:36, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete unless someone can find something else interesting about this number. --Salix alba (talk) 20:36, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete- non-notable. Qtoktok 20:53, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete- I want that 201 seconds of my life back. --Long, Tall Texan 20:56, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - I submitted the prod as non-notable number. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 21:07, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. There's been plenty of debate on numbers in the past, but I still think these should probably be deleted. Sure, Wikipedia is not paper, but there are an infinite amount of numbers. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 21:08, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete- Unless something more notable is added. For example under 13 (number) there is an assortment of interesting facts relative to the number. PrettyMuchBryce 21:29, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. ConDem^Talk 23:04, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete - If there is no speedy delete for non-notable numbers, there ought to be one. There are a lot more nn numbers than nn people+bands together. Lambiam^Talk 00:28, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Melchoir 01:22, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Fagstein 07:22, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. As per the Numbers WikiProject guidelines, 201 is covered at 200 (number), and what's there is definitely not enough for a whole article. Confusing Manifestation 15:22, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Merge With 201 (year). It is not a notable number, but it could have some use there. Jonathan235 15:25, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.