Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 in New Zealand television

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 2007 in New Zealand. There's really no useful content in this article yet. W.marsh 16:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 2007 in New Zealand television

2007 in New Zealand television (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)
  • Previous years in New Zealand have yielded at most five or six but usually just two things of note occuring in the New Zealand TV industry. Two items is not enough for a whole article. It makes more sense to generate a whole article if neccessary than to have an article lying around on the off-chance it will be of use. In fact, it makes no sense to merge it with 2007 in New Zealand, because the latter page has more info on it that this one. Kripto 12:51, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge with 2007 in New Zealand. Terence Ong 13:57, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - mere stub status is not a valid reason for AFD. Just because the article is sparse now does not mean someone will not step in in the future and build the article. Remember: AFD is for weeding out articles that NEVER should be articles - ever. If this article is deleted in this vote - we will NEVER be able to have this article in the future. NZTV is a vibrant category ripe with encyclopedic information and a valid topic for WP. It is simply lacking content because no knowledgeable editors have stepped in to beef it up yet. Davodd 02:37, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per Davodd ("mere stub status is not a valid reason for AFD"). Mathmo Talk 16:12, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per verifiability policy "if an article topic has no reliable, third-party sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on it"... Addhoc 19:03, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.