Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 Number Ones

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete I tried to look for context anywhere, even the title, but couldn't find any. —Resurgent insurgent 2007-05-08 02:08Z

[edit] 2006 Number Ones

2006 Number Ones (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Number ones where, of what and according to whom? Looks like some pop charts, either copyrighted or made up, at any rate not encyclopedic. Author currently blocked for persistently removing the maintenance tags on it. Sandstein 19:54, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. Un-encyclopedic, unsourced and unclear what the article is actually about, as it is nothing more than a list.--Atlan 20:10, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete. (Re-added because of accidental edit overwrite). We already have plenty of lists of number one songs and albums, sorted by country and by year. --Crunch 20:33, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete. A quick check of the songs entered indicates the list doesn't correspond to any known list of number one songs. Highly misleading.--Work permit 21:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Information is redundant with list of number one article (AQu01rius • Talk) 22:01, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - unencyclopedic and no sources. The Hippie 22:57, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete as the creator of the article, Characteroflove (talk • contribs • count • total • block log), has shown a complete disregard for Wikipedia's standards and is unlikely to actually fix it (and in fact the editor was blocked earlier today after summarily deleting the {{Copyedit}}, {{Unreferenced}}, and {{Uncategorized}} maintenance tags from the article four times in five hours ([1], [2], [3], [4]). --Kralizec! (talk) 00:14, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.