Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2000s in politics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:54, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 2000s in politics

2000s in politics (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This entire article is merely a miscellaneous collection of OR that exists elsewhere, and attempts to cover a topic that cannot be contained within a single article. It is of no use to anyone; no one would ever come here to learn anything. Unschool 03:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete this is really approaching indiscriminate collection of information, to try to document everything that happened in politics across a span of 10 years. Corpx 04:33, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I agree, well done to Unschool for creating it though. I'm joking, I'm sure it was an attempt to improve 2000s. All of the articles in the "See also" section of 2000s should probably be deleted as well. Apart from the reasons stated, we can't really have retrospective articles about a decade that hasn't finished. One of them has already been deleted. Crazysuit 04:41, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. Where the hell is Anglo-America? Mandsford 19:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This gives us really little new info from other multiple articles that has those events.--JForget 23:18, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.