Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2000s in cinema
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and redirect to 2000s in film. — TKD::Talk 14:24, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 2000s in cinema
This article is a collection of disparate original research that does not form anything that could fairly be called an "article". It lacks anything cohesive that would be worth preserving. Unschool 04:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as unsourced OR and redundant to 2000s in film. Dbromage [Talk] 04:30, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant. Daniel Case 04:53, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete an essay and synthesis of current/past events Corpx 05:06, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect to 2000s in film, for which it is a plausible search (merging, of course, anything that is of value, which, as Unschool observes, appears to be quite little). Joe 06:16, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect per Joe, good suggestion. --Oscarthecat 08:27, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Comment This decade, more than any other decade yet experienced in history, has been referred to by Tim Russert as "the incomplete decade" Mandsford 17:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect Per Joe. ♠TomasBat 22:22, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect agreed Joe. Carlosguitar 23:45, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This is unsourced and redundant. No prejudice against creating a redirect after deletion. Jay32183 17:58, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect We already have 2000s in film. --Pixelface 22:10, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
