Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2-amino-1-oxodisilanol

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete Wikibofh 22:06, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 2-amino-1-oxodisilanol

Unverifiable. Note that the "inventor" is the student president at University of Alaska Fairbanks[1] Pburka 03:40, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

This could be touching on a broader topic of what organic compounds should be incorporated into wikipedia. I have a copy of the Merck Index lying around, which I could open up and start entering all kinds of random chemicals. Some certainly deserve attention (e.g. aspirin) while other molecules like the one at issue here are truly non-notable.) --Daniel Lotspeich 03:44, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, we could keep chemicals that are regulary used in households and industrial processes, and those that are notable for some other reason. There should be at least one medium to large paragraph about its uses and not its properties. -- Kjkolb 04:07, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete A guideline per Daniel Lotspeich is probably a good idea, but I think one can safely predict that whatever it may suggest, this would fall well below threshhold. Dottore So 08:42, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as original research (plus WP is not a crystal ball). But I think that once they are successfully synthesised and characterised, all chemicals should be notable - WP is not paper. --DrTorstenHenning 09:22, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - as per DrTorstenHenning CLW 13:20, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Masterhatch 10:33, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete or Speedy Delete could be considered probable vanity. If not, it does not warrant an article. Could perhaps be mentioned elsewhere, but as it has not been successfully synthesized, it is relatively unimportant. Cool3 04:05, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. If this compound is ever made and if someone has the time and energy it will be simple to recreate a more worthy {{chem-stub}} than this. Physchim62 15:04, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.